Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that China's economic miracle has been achieved at the expense of its natural environment. Although considerable emphasis is now being given to the environment in the central government's current policy initiatives, reversing the degradation of natural capital will require the full range of policy mechanisms. Although businesses must be made to comply with regulations, collaboration from management will be required to implement various nonregulatory policy mechanisms. Consequently, it is important to understand managers' assessment of the current situation, particularly in light of China's 'command-and-control' tradition and whom they hold responsible. From a sample of 653 managers in three large urban centers, it was found that Chinese managers hold multiple institutions responsible. The central and local governments are held primarily responsible-both for not having passed stricter regulations and for not having enforced those already on the books. Economic organizations are held secondarily responsible. Significant differences among sectors and regions, however, were also observed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 445-465 |
| Journal | Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Corresponding author email
Fryxell@ceibs.edu, mscarlos@polyu.edu.hkUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT
- GUANGZHOU
Indexed by
- Scopus
- SSCI
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Allocation of responsibility: managerial perspectives on pollution in three Chinese municipalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver